my london diary index
 

March 2010

Mums & Midwives Reclaim Birth
Support the Iranian Women's Struggle
Million Women Rise
Tibet Freedom March
UAF Oppose EDL Westminster March
Holloway Protest for Yarl's Wood Women

january
february
march
april
may
june
july
august
september
october
november
december

Stock photography by Peter+Marshall at Alamy

Other sites with my pictures include
london pictures
londons industrial history
>Re:PHOTO My thoughts on photography

All pictures Copyright © Peter Marshall 2010, all rights reserved.
Hight res images available for reproduction - for licences to reproduce images or buy prints or other questions and comments, contact me. Selected images are also available from Alamy and Photofusion

Mums and Midwives Reclaim Birth

Geraldine Harmsworth Park to Downing St. Sun 7 March 2010

Of course there were Dads as well on the march

more pictures

More than a thousand people, many with pushchairs and young children, marched over Westminster Bridge in London on Sunday afternoon to a rally at Downing Street. The 'Reclaiming Birth Rally' supported the Albany Midwifery Practice and called for the nation-wide adoption of similar case loaded midwifery services which would look after women from conception past birth and give real choice to all mothers rather than a lucky or privileged few. London 07/03/2010

The Albany Midwifery Practice based in Peckham, one of the most highly deprived areas of England was widely regarded as a model of best practice and a centre of excellence in NHS midwifery, for the support that it gave to women throughout pregnancy, birth and the post-natal period, encouraging women to make informed choices about how and where they give birth.

Recently King's College Hospital terminated their contract following a critical report from the Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE) which King's claim showed "serious shortcomings" over one aspect of their work, forcing the centre to close down. Others see the decision as an attack on alternative ways of maternity care that provide better overall outcomes and better meet the needs of women.

Overall the Albany achieved perinatal mortality rates of 4.9/1000 considerably below the national average and much lower than the 11.4/1000 for Southwark Borough where it is located. Only around 1 in 7 of women in their care gave birth by Caesarean section, compared to 1 in 4 for King's College Hospital, and almost half (46.7%) chose to give birth at home, compared to one mother in sixteen (6.2%) in the borough as a whole. And while nationally roughly one mother in three continues to breastfeed their babies, the figure at Albany was more than three quarters. The NCT, IM UK and others have expressed concern over King's action and the rally called for an independent review of the critical report and an inquiry into the decision to terminate the Albany contract, with the findings to be made public.

The rally was supported by AIMS (Association For Improvements In The Maternity Services), NCT (National Childbirth Trust), ARM (Association of Radical Midwives), IM UK (Independent Midwives UK) and Albany Mums. It also called for a real change in maternity care across the country, with the replacement of the current doctor led hospital services which are so often unsupportive and even traumatic for mothers by case loaded midwifery services following the example given by Albany and other similar practices. These provide a much more comprehensive service with better information and fuller support for women, including more midwives, at no greater cost than the current system.
more pictures

Support the Iranian Women's Struggle

Iranian Embassy to Trafalgar Square, London. Sun 7 March, 2010

The march from the Iranian Embassy arrives in Trafalgar Square, watched by two policemen
more pictures


More than 50 men and women, mainly Iranians, took part in a protest organised by the 8 March Women's Organsiation (Iran-Afghanistan) to mark International Women's Day. They protested at the Iranian Embassy against the 31 years of anti-women Islamic laws and repression and calling for an end to the Islamic regime in Iran before marching to Trafalgar Square for a rally. The protesters stood opposite the Iranian Embassy in Kensington with placards calling for an end to violence against women and stating that the forced wearing of the veil is the symbol of Women's subjugation.

They demanded an end to the Islamic regime and equal rights for women, who at the moment cannot travel freely and do not have custody of their children, as well as the right to abortion, currently illegal in Iran. They also called for an end to the stoning of women for adultery, officially this was ended in 2002 but there have been a number of well-documented cases of this barbaric punishment since then.

Police had coned off one lane of the road and erected pens to facilitate the demonstration and briefly checked with the protesters what they intended to do.

From Kensington the protesters, accompanied by a samba band, marched to Traalgar Square, where a rally was held on the North Terrace. There were speeches and messages from the 8 March Women's Organisation, the European Democratic Women Movement (Turkey), Hands off People of Iran, the Organisation of Women's Freedom in Iraq and the Million Women Rise movement.

There were then appearances by a number or artists and I stayed to listen to the powerful singing of Gisoo Shakeri and to hear poet Ziba Karbasi reading several of her poems. Although both performed in a language I cannot understand, there work was still moving. Unfortunately I had to leave before the other performances on the programme.
more pictures

Million Women Rise

Marble Arch to Trafalgar Square, London. Sat 6 March, 2010

The march turns in to Oxford St
more pictures

Several thousand women marched through London on Saturday 6 March, taking over the street as they passed as an all-women area and calling for an end to male violence against women. The march started along London's major shopping street, Oxford Street, before going through Piccadilly Circus and on to a rally in Trafalgar Square.

First celebrated in 1909 by the Socialist Party of America, International Women's Day was established in 1910 by the Second International following a proposal by Clara Zetkin, although the date only became 8 March in 1913 when peace rallies were held on that day shortly before the First World War. IWD rallies led to the start of the Russian Revolution in 1917 and Lenin made the day an official "holiday", although it remained a working day there until 1965. The UN adopted it in 1975 and in 2005 the TUC called for it to be made a UK public holiday.

The Million Women Rise march, on the Saturday nearest to International Women's Day - March 8th - is organised by a coalition of individual women and representatives from the Women’s Voluntary and Community Sector, and it aims to "celebrate and honour women’s activism, courage and achievements and continued struggle against global male violence in all its forms."

Million Women Rise is a part of a wider international movement to end violence against women, and the flyer handed out on the march presented the reality of violence for women in the UK and internationally. In this country almost 1 in 4 women are said to have experienced some form of sexual assault and on average two women are murdered each week by a partner or former partner. A third of all teenage girls who are in relationships suffer unwanted sexual acts and one in four are the subject of actual physical violence.

Trafficking is a large-scale global industry, with two million girls between the ages of 5 and fifteen being sold into sex slavery each year. Lack of health provision is also a major problem; one woman dies in pregnancy for every minute of the year, and most of these deaths are preventable.

There were a very wide range of groups represented in the march from WI groups to radical feminists and including a some left-wing organisations.
more pictures

Tibet Freedom March

Chinese Embassy to Westminster, London. Sat 6 March, 2010

China Stole My Land, My Voice, My Freedom - the march at Piccadilly Circus
more pictures

Around 500 people, including many Tibetans, marched through London commemorating the 51st anniversary of the Tibetan National Uprising and calling for freedom from Chinese rule. The protest started opposite the Chinese Embassy, where a letter was delivered and continued through the busy shopping streets of the West End to deliver a second letter to Downing St before ending with a rally outside the Foreign Office.

The event was organised by a coalition of Tibetan groups in the UK and comes two years after protests in Tibet led to the death of over 200 young Tibetans, with many more being imprisoned. Over 1000 are still unaccounted for and two, Lobsang Gyaltsen and Mr Loyak, were executed in October 2009. Similar events were taking place in countries around the world.

At the start of the march there was a brief address and the Tibetan National Anthem was sung, followed by a minutes silence in memory of the dead and prayers. A small delegation then went across the road to the Chinese Embassy to deliver a letter to the new Chinese Ambassador.

As in previous years, there was no one at the Chinese Embassy to take the message, which was handed to the police officer at the main door to pass on. The march attracted considerable attention on Regent St and particularly at Oxford Circus and Piccadilly Circus, with shoppers stopping to watch and many waving in support, with drivers of cars and lorries sounding their horns.

Near the front of the march was a large banner with the Tibetan's message "China stole my land, my voice, my freedom." Among the slogans chanted by marchers were "Tibetans have no voice in Tibet", "China: stop silencing Tibetans"; "Britain: stand up for Tibetans in Tibet" and "Stop the torture in Tibet".
more pictures

UAF Oppose EDL Westminster March

Westminster, London. Friday 5 March, 2010

Ban the Burkha but not the Balaclava? Is that man scratching his head?
more pictures

Between five hundred and athousand EDL supporters marched to the Houses of Parliament this afternoon in support of Geert Wilders of the Dutch Freedom Party surrounded by police and accompanied by police horses. They were met by around the same number of UAF counter-demonstrators, who had earlier blocked the road but were removed by police who made several arrests and kept the two sides well apart.

The UAF (Unite Against Fascism) demonstrators gathered in Old Palace Yard opposite the Houses of Parliament a couple of hours before the EDL (English Defence League) were due to arrive. While I was there they chanted slogans against the EDL and there was a short address by MP Jeremy Corbyn. The UAF accuses the EDL of being a fascist, racist and homophobic group of football hooligans, and is also opposed to the showing of Geert Wilders's film ‘Fitna’, which it says is racist and incites violence against Muslims.

In 'Fitna', Wilder use of verses from the Koran, combining them with images of violence, and compares Islam to Nazism. Muslims regard his use of the Koran as blasphemous abuse and he has received death threats, but he defends his actions as an example of freedom of speech. While we may deplore his film, the deathnthreats are unacceptable in civilised societies. But it does seems inconsistent that Wilders is calling for a ban on the Koran in the Netherlands, claiming that like Hitler's Mein Kampf which is already banned there, it is a work of totalitarian ideology that incites violence.

The EDL were supposed to be gathering outside Tate Britain, but when I arrived there was nobody there. Walking down the road a couple of hundred yards there were a hundred or so of them on the pavement outside the Morpeth Arms and more packed inside. I talked to a number of them and most were happy to be photographed, many posing for the camera.

All I talked to were eager to stress that they were not racist, and were not anti-Muslim, but only against Muslim extremists. They said they were opposed to the increasing Islamic nature of English cities and in particular to the suggestions that Sharia law should play any part in British justice. They also made clear their strong feeling that they did not get fair treatment in the press.

As at previous EDL/March for England events I've photographed, there were a handful of black members present and around the same number of women. It was a stark contrast to the UAF supporters, many of whom were women and represented the diversity of backgrounds we are now used to in London, although most were young, including many students.

Later during the actual march I did get sworn at, threatened and given the finger, but only by a small minority of marchers, and a young female Asian journalist seemed to attract considerably more aggravation than me. There was also a considerable amount of clearly anti-Muslim shouting and singing, and the placards and slogans that attack the building of mosques seem to threaten all Muslims rather than just the extremists. The atmosphere was unpleasant, and really gave the lie to the earlier denials of racism.

However I did not hear the songs about 'Allah' that gave offence at some earlier events. The EDL had asked marchers not to sing these and had carefully organised stewards, with team leaders, first aiders and others in colour coded vests, although it was unfortunate during the short rally before the march that one steward in particular attempted to stop photographers taking pictures. As a police officer pointed out politely to him, it just meant we took more pictures, particularly of him. But I did see stewards keeping some of the more disorderly supporters in line rather firmly at times, preventing them from attacking the press and other onlookers.

The main speaker outside Tate Britain was a Sikh, Amit Singh, who appeared at least at some points in his address to be attacking Muslims rather than extremist views. A police officer had a serious word with him after his speech although this may have been connected with his use of offensive language rather than the rest of what he said.

After the rally, the march moved off towards the Houses of Parliament where the marchers were met by loud shouting from the UAF. There were a few minor incidents as the march passed the crowd, but these were quickly dealt with by police, who filtered the EDL into a pen on the north side of the road, with the UAF being kept behind the permanent barriers in front of Parliament on the opposite side of the road. The first thing that many of the EDL did on arriving in the pen was to urinate against the wall of Westminster Abbey.

The two groups continued to shout at each other for at least an hour - after which I left. There was again some racist abuse from the EDL, but they also made a point of denying they were racist and showing off their few Black and Asian EDL members to the press. But it stood out very clearly that the EDL were almost entirely white and male, while the opposing UAF was very multiracial with women probably in the majority.

Police let a few of the EDL leave (and escorted some to Westminster tube) but most were held inside the pen. But although the UAF were kept behind barriers, at this point they were not penned, and some soon began to drift away, and I too decided it was time to leave. Half an hour later I could still see the police helicopter hovering over Westminster.

Many young working class people in England do feel strongly that they have been marginalized and neglected, particularly those who have not achieved highly in the education system, many of whom are unemployed or in tedious and often badly paid jobs. It isn't surprising that they are fertile ground for the kind of racist stereotypes and myths peddled by right wing groups such as the BNP, even if some present them in a less overt form.

Although it important that these views are challenged and that people demonstrate their opposition to groups like the EDL, rather than simply dismissing them as racists, attention need to be paid to the underlying causes. Which means confronting issues of class which it has been fashionable to dismiss over the past decades, and encouraging a pride in our heritage and in an inclusive Britain which is a home for all our people wherever their origins.

I didn't at all enjoy being in the company of the EDL, hearing their racism and right wing simplicities. It was an unpleasant way to spend an afternoon, but I think its important to show these events and these people honestly.
more pictures

Holloway Protest for Yarl's Wood Women

HM Prison Holloway, London. Wednesday 3 March, 2010
On the main road outside Hollowar Prison wher several of the Yarls's Wood women on huger strike were held
more pictures

More than 50 people protested at Holloway Prison on Wednesday evening against the holding of five women from Yarl's Wood immigration detention centre without trial or charge and to support the women at Yarl's Wood in the fourth week of their hunger strike against the degrading conditions and inhumane treatment there. Three of the women are in Holloway, one in solitary confinement, and two are at Bronzefield Prison in Ashford, Middlesex.

On Tuesday this week, the 19 women at Yarl's Wood confirmed that they were still continuing their hunger strike. They have reacted angrily to statements by Home Office Minister Meg Hillier that the women refusing food were buying food from the shop in the centre and getting it from visitors. As well as denying the claims they have also pointed out that visitors are not permitted to bring food into the centre.

The protesters also called for an end to the use of detention and in particular for the detention of women with children which amounts to child abuse. They also want SERCO guards at the centre to be prosecuted for their racist and sexual abuse.

The loud chanting and samba band will have made the protest and its message of support heard to the women held inside the jail, and certainly a little jumping up and down with the music helped make those taking part outside a little less frozen in the chill wind.

The protesters blocked the vehicle entrance to the prison, and one SERCO prison van that arrived during the demonstration quickly backed out of the driveway and went away. A van full of police also arrived and came and asked a few of the demonstrators what was going on, and then stayed to watch but made no attempt to move the demonstrators while I was there, though after half an hour or so an officer did remove a 'incident tape' that had been stretched across the prison entrance.

The Home Office and SERCO have also issued denials of the allegations of violent attacks, beatings, victimisation and abuse at the centre, but as well as the many consistent allegations made by over 50 women in the centre, there are also mobile phone images of some of the injuries, and women who have been released since the main incident have given interviews.

Journalists and MPs have been asking questions about the mistreatment of detainees at the centre, and lawyers have attempted to challenge the treatment of detainees as a breach of their human rights under European Convention articles 3,5 and 8. Certainly many of those who have seen the system, either as detainees or visitors - even on carefully conducted tours - have been scandalized by what they have seen. We should be treating these people, many of whom have fled from traumatic situations in their own countries in a far more humane fashion.
more pictures


   top of page

All pictures on this section of the site are Copyright © Peter Marshall 2010; to buy prints or for permission to reproduce pictures or to comment on this site, or for any other questions, contact me.

Site search: powered by FreeFind
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010